vote.direct vs AssociationVoting

AssociationVoting, like vote.direct, actually publishes per-election prices, which most of this market does not: free to 25 voters, then $99 to 125, $199 to 500, and $299 to 5,000, against vote.direct's free to 25, $4.99 to 50, and $19.99 for 200 voters — lower at every size both platforms publish, with SMS verification included and government ID at $3.00 per voter, neither of which AssociationVoting offers.

AssociationVoting publishes per-election prices, which deserves credit in a market that mostly quotes: free for 1–25 eligible voters, $99 for 26–125, $199 for 126–500, and $299 for 501–5,000, with an annual subscription at $299–$699 for unlimited non-concurrent elections. Add-ons are priced too: election set-up service $250, turnout booster $50, mailed voter verification announcement $100, postcards $2.15–$3.15 each. Checked on AssociationVoting's pricing page in August 2026.

At every size both platforms publish, yes: both are free to 25 voters, then vote.direct is $9.99 against $99 at 100 voters, $19.99 against $199 at 200, and $39.99 against $199 at 500, with email and SMS verification included. The honest exception is 1,551–5,000 voters, where AssociationVoting publishes $299 and vote.direct's self-serve ladder has ended, so vote.direct quotes individually.

Its published verification is email, plus a mailed "voter verification announcement" as a $100 add-on. It does not publish SMS code verification or government-ID checks. vote.direct includes email and SMS verification in every tier and offers government ID at $3.00 per voter — with the verification method behind each ballot recorded in the audit record.

AssociationVoting publishes an annual subscription at $299–$699 for unlimited non-concurrent elections for a single association. vote.direct sells subscriptions too, and for most boards neither is the right buy: at one or two elections a year, paying the flat rate per election (free to 25 voters, from $4.99) is usually cheaper than any subscription on either platform. Count your real election calendar before paying for unlimited anything.

vote.direct publishes this comparison and sells one of the products in it, so read it as a vendor making its case rather than as independent research. Everything below about a competitor was read off that company's own public pricing and documentation pages in August 2026, and where a competitor is the better choice this page says so and says why. Competitors change their pricing and features without notice. If you work at one of these companies, or you are a customer who finds something here that is out of date or wrong, email [email protected] and it will be corrected.

vote.direct has 3 public third-party reviews: one on Capterra and 2 on Trustpilot, all of them 5 out of 5. Trustpilot's profile displays a TrustScore of 3.8 rather than 5.0, even though its own histogram reads 100% five-star, because a TrustScore is a weighted average that starts a new profile near 3.7 and only moves to the real mean as reviews accumulate. Both numbers are honest; that one is theirs and we do not get to change it. 3 reviews is not a track record either, and no board should choose a voting platform on the strength of it. ElectionBuddy, Simply Voting, and OpaVote have all been running elections far longer and have the independent reviews to show for it. If review volume is your deciding factor, they win it outright and this page will not talk you out of that. What we can do is show you every review we have in full, including the parts that are critical of us, and link them so you can confirm we did not edit them. Both halves of that come from the same fact: vote.direct is small and founder-run. It is why there are only 3 public reviews, and it is why you can get the founder on the phone. A large organization buying on vendor track record should weigh the first. A volunteer board that needs a real person when a vote is live on a Sunday should weigh the second. Which matters more is a judgment this page cannot make for you.

What vote.direct has instead of a review history is direct access. The support number, (512) 222-8191, reaches the founder, Oday Brahem, who is also the engineer who builds the product. Call it, text it, or email, any day of the week including weekends, and the reply comes from the person who can change the software rather than from a first-line queue that has to escalate to find out whether something is possible.

vote.direct is operated by Syft8, Inc. and is 100% owned by its founder, Oday Brahem, with no outside investors. Who owns a voting platform is worth knowing before you trust it with an election, so this one is on the record: the person who owns the company is the person who builds the software and answers (512) 222-8191. The founder has a name and a checkable record: Oday Brahem, based in Vancouver, spent eight years in regulated enterprise software at Collabware and VersaFile — QA engineering on a product serving US federal customers under FedRAMP High controls, then customer success, then sales engineering — and served as an intelligence operator in the Canadian Armed Forces reserves. He builds vote.direct and answers its support line himself. Background with sources: https://vote.direct/about/oday-brahem

If vote.direct does not yet offer a capability and you cannot find it elsewhere in the market, call or text the founder. When the requirement fits secure, compliant elections, the same team that hears it will work with you to understand it, design and build the capability, and support its rollout. We want to earn your business by closing that gap, not by asking you to settle for a fixed feature list. Scope, timing, and cost are agreed before custom work begins.